logo-small.png
- BLOG -

Headquarters

501 Boylston Street, 10th Floor

Boston, MA 02116

(617)-737-5000

info@outsidegc.com

ON-DEMAND INSIGHTS

Up-Close: Outbound Content Licensing Agreements

Posted by Dori Solomon on January 5, 2018 at 4:05 PM
Find me on:

Optimize the value of licensed content by including auditing and reporting rights in outbound content license agreements

Content Licensing AgreementThe owner/licensor of digital content is typically in the driver’s seat when it comes to structuring the terms of a content licensing arrangement. To that end, licensors will be better served using their own form of agreement, rather than relying on that of the licensee. Licensors can determine everything from the scope of use and amount of control they retain over their content to the terms of compensation. With respect to the latter, compensation is often a variable amount based on either a percentage of advertising revenue earned on pages containing the licensed content, or some other metric such as the number of clicks, unique visitors or page views.

Despite these contractual advantages, the licensor can undermine its position when compensation is performance-based by failing to accurately track/measure the performance of licensed content. In addition to implementing some form of digital asset measurement and analytics system, I regularly advise clients to include 2 key provisions in a content licensing agreement, which are intended to protect their revenue stream: (1) reporting obligations and (2) audit rights.

Reporting Obligations
With variable compensation arrangements, the licensee should be required to provide regular reporting upon which monthly invoicing will be based. This provision should:

  • define the type of reporting console or a minimum of daily reporting with real-time (or 15-minute delay) statistics for each page containing the licensed content.
  • specify the metrics to be included such as number of unique views, page views, and clicks, total advertising revenue, and net revenue due to the licensor. You might also include a sample report in the Agreement.

Audit Rights
Most licensors will track performance metrics on their own, usually with the help of third-party providers (e.g., comScore, Omniture, Google Analytics, etc.). However, it is equally important for the licensor to reserve the right to inspect and audit the licensee’s records in the event they disagree with any of the licensee’s calculations. An audit provision should address the following:

  • the right of the licensor to access and inspect the licensee’s books and records tracking amounts payable to the licensor under the terms of the agreement.
  • the process for notifying the licensee of a suspected reporting discrepancy
  • the frequency with which a licensor may request an audit, as well as when the licensee is expected to comply with such requests.
  • who will be responsible for the cost of an audit. Normally, this is the licensor’s responsibility, unless a material (i.e., 5% or higher) discrepancy is found, in which case it becomes the licensee’s obligation.
  • when the licensee is required to pay the amount of any discovered deficiency (typically, within 30 days of notice from the licensor).

By including these reporting and auditing rights in your outbound content license agreement, you will help to ensure that you receive the most value for your licensed content.

 

Dori Solomon is a Member of Outside GC’s Washington D.C-area team. She focuses her practice on digital content licensing, e-commerce and internet law, leveraging 20+ years of in-house experience at AOL where she handled, among other things, content licensing and syndication, software and technology licensing (including SaaS), talent agreements, sponsorship agreements, and venue agreements. Dori can be reached at dsolomon@outsidegc.com.

Topics: content licensing, commercial contracts

Subscribe to our Blog

Popular Posts

   
Outside GC is an innovative approach to legal services for growing and mature businesses. Companies who engage Outside GC fall into two main categories: (1) those without in-house counsel who need regular, on-going legal support but do not wish to hire a full-time in-house lawyer, and (2) those with in-house counsel who do not wish to add more full-time resources to their existing in-house staff. Contact us to speak to one of our on-demand attorneys.